Section removal poll

TormakSaber · Post by **TormakSaber** » Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:49 am

I like most every section. >_>

Grath · Post by **Grath** » Sun Oct 12, 2008 11:06 am

One of these two could stand to be cut without losing much:
51
52
But that's about it.

Lizzie · Post by **Lizzie** » Sun Oct 12, 2008 12:07 pm

Grath wrote:One of these two could stand to be cut without losing much:
51
52
But that's about it.

Noooooooooooooo I use those way too much. D:

Master Chief · Post by **Master Chief** » Sun Oct 12, 2008 12:14 pm

27
28
29 (bleh, three huge chunks with terrible aesthetic value)
33 (wtf is this for, use 70)
57 (ugly)

Post by **Anna** » Sun Oct 12, 2008 1:14 pm

27, 28 and 29 have uses.

Removal of them will make me quite unhappy.

Grath · Post by **Grath** » Sun Oct 12, 2008 1:43 pm

How about this
By now, it's too late to remove sections.

Edit:
Also, Lizzie, I said 'One of these two could be removed'. They're the 2/3 nearly-interchangeable sections of BSFCE.

Exethalion · Post by **Exethalion** » Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:14 pm

38
42

Post by **Arcalane** » Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:21 pm

Exe, you're a goddamn idiot.

31 is a standard core armour plate.

33 is used to connect 32 to 34 for extendable-length hydraulics.

38 is by far the ugliest aerial, not 39.

What did 42 ever do to you?

Exethalion · Post by **Exethalion** » Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:32 pm

Okay okay, sorry, posted with a hangover and triple failed, I meant 38 was the ugliest aerial, got mixed up, and I didn't realise the whole hydraulic thing till you told me, and I failed to see that the core fits nicely in 31.

But I stand by 42.

Edit: GODDAMN IT, NINJAS ALL ROUND, SAVE ME SUDAFED, SAVE ME

Post by **Anna** » Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:34 pm

31 (needs improvement to blend with megatach better)

Megatach? What? What does Section 31 have to do with Megatachs? o_O This is what Section 31 is for:

33 (utterly useless)
34

While I agree that 33 isn't particularly useful, since we have section 70, section 34 is part of the 32-33-34 chain.

39 (ugliest aerial section, 2 is more than enough)

I disagree. I personally think section 38 is far worse and has less uses.

42

And while I may personally find this section useless, people like Arcalane do not...

And this is why I hate the entire concept of removing sections from BSF:CE. Because everyone loses, that way. If it had been said from the start that the sections were just trial sections and that some would be stripped away be "popular vote", that would have been a different matter, but eh...

EDIT: Damnit. Beaten by Arca. Fuck. And Exe! Damnit!

TormakSaber · Post by **TormakSaber** » Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:43 pm

And this is why I hate the entire concept of removing sections from BSF:CE. Because everyone loses, that way. If it had been said from the start that the sections were just trial sections and that some would be stripped away be "popular vote", that would have been a different matter, but eh.

Yus, I agree. It's always harder to trim down than it is to add to it.

Cycerin · Post by **Cycerin** » Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:13 pm

Don't want any of them to go, tbh.

Master Chief · Post by **Master Chief** » Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:46 pm

Agreed. Personally though it wouldn't hurt to remove some of the sections, it wouldn't benefit either. Might as well leave them as they are. We'll all find uses for them I'm sure.

Kanosint · Post by **Kanosint** » Sun Oct 12, 2008 11:34 pm

I do think 33 is useless, it's 2 70s... If you just rename 70 to 33, it's all good...

BoVinE · Post by **BoVinE** » Sun Oct 12, 2008 11:40 pm

The problem I have with 33 is that it;s an extremely constrained part, useful in basically one situation.